Part of the problem is that search engines are not as good as they used to be,
especially Google — largely because of web sites applying
search engine optimization so they get more income from advertising, and partly because the search engines try to guess what you want instead of giving you what you ask for. The latter is mostly the problem we face, I think, though it’s probably useful for mainstream searches like
how to boil an egg:
View attachment 515229
But it does not help for something like
Leopard 1 engine compartment firewall:
View attachment 515230
Sure, the Leopard 1 query has engine compartment shots, but all of them are from models, when I (presumably) want pictures of the real thing so I can see if my model kit parts are correct or need more work.
I can’t offer any specific solution, because I also frequently struggle with this, but I do have some tips. If you find you get a lot of results that seem to be based on only one of the words in the search, but you actually want to search for a specific combination, add quote marks around them. For example,
Humber armoured car will give results for Humber, and due to the word
car being in there, I suspect you’ll find a good number of pictures of Humber motorcars as well as armoured ones — and perhaps even of the river, too. But
Humber "armoured car" should ensure that the search engine doesn’t look for all three of
Humber,
armoured and
car but for
Humber and
armoured car. Hopefully.
Another reasonably good way I’ve found to narrow down the search, at least for Second World War vehicles, is to tell it to only show black-and-white photos. With Google, if you click on the
Tools button near the top, just above the image results, you get an extra little toolbar where you can select things like image size, colours, licences, etc. By saying you only want black-and-white, you’ll eliminate most or all of the model photos that always clutter up these searches, as well as modern (because colour) pictures of unrelated things. Unfortunately this doesn’t help much if you’re searching for, say,
Ukrainian T-80 modifications
Also, change search terms slightly if you can’t find what you’re after. Either add more terms to make it more specific, or remove one (or more) if you don’t get anything useful at all, or change a word to a synonym.
Plus: don’t just use image search. If you let it search web pages (that is, the standard search, without saying you want images), you’ll probably get pages that include photos of what you’re after, but which won’t show up in the image search. Of course, it’s much more work to trawl through those yourself, but with a bit of luck you’ll find more of what you’re after.
Oh yeah, and just walk away and try again from scratch later. Even that may turn up results you didn’t find first time round
Edit, the next day: I realised this morning that I forgot to mention a few tricks.
One is that quote marks can be used not only to group things together, but that they actually mean “I want this
exactly”. For example, if you search for
Humber armoured car and you’re getting a lot of hits for armoured cars of other types, try
"Humber" armoured car. This should go some way to excluding things that don’t include the word
Humber.
Another is the
- operator, which tells the search engine that you
don’t want that term. If you put a
- directly in front of a word (no space between the two), it hopefully shouldn’t show you things that do include it. For example,
Humber armoured car -model -kit should weed out sites that have the words
model and/or
kit on them, and so probably return more hits for the real vehicle instead.
You can combine this with quote marks:
Humber armoured car -"scout car" should work to exclude sites about the Humber scout car, for example, if you’re getting too many hits for that as well.
Another option is to specify web sites to search, or not to search:
Humber site:mapleleafup.net to only search at the MLU site, or
Humber -site:mapleleafup.net to
not include results from that. Again, you can use these to try and weed out unwanted results, or to try and get better results from sites that you think have good information, but return also too much stuff you’re not interested in.