Scale Model Shop

Collapse

Completed Special Hobby 1/32 Westland Whirlwind.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stona
    • Jul 2008
    • 9889

    #1

    Completed Special Hobby 1/32 Westland Whirlwind.

    THE KIT.

    If you want a Whirlwind in this scale you are buying this kit. I would give it an honest 7/10. It’s a nice kit, looks like a Whirlwind to me and was fun to build. If you are expecting something like a Tamiya 'uber' kit you are going to be disappointed, the kit does need a bit of work. Generally, the fit is good and the moulding is good. The instructions are a bit vague, not helped by a lack of references. There are no Whirlwinds extant in the world today, so you can’t check a museum example. Bearing that in mind Special Hobby have done a great job. Some of the engineering is unusual and makes some parts of construction a bit of a fiddle, you will have a few issues to resolve. I would not recommend it if you have never built a large scale aeroplane kit before, but otherwise go for it!

    THIS WHIRLWIND.

    I’ve chosen to complete the aircraft in the Temperate Land Scheme, as Whirlwinds would have been seen throughout the early war years and most of 1941.

    This is a Whirlwind operated by No. 263 Squadron, coded HE-J. The aircraft was delivered to the squadron, based at Exeter, on 3 January 1941. It did not enjoy a long and illustrious career! On 11 March 1941 it crashed at Prendannack, injuring the pilot P/O Herbert Kitchener DFM (awarded on 6 August 1940 for his actions flying in the Norwegian campaign). It had just 25 flying hours on the airframe at the time.

    On 11 March Kitchener had pursued a Ju 88 towards France in bad weather but both his engines were damaged by return fire. He was escorted back to England on one engine by his wingman, but then his remaining (starboard) engine also gave out. Kitchener attempted a landing at Prendannack, then under construction, crashing heavily, breaking his skull and an arm. He did claim the Ju 88 as damaged. The Whirlwind was Struck Off Charge shortly thereafter. Kitchener did not return to flying until September 1941, six months later.

    Kitchener is fifth from the left, at the front, with both hands in his pockets, in this photograph, taken at RAF Drem on 30/10/40, not long after his return from the action in Norway.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Kitchener_Drem_30_10_40.png
Views:	6
Size:	6.1 KB
ID:	1153289

    Here's one of my walkarounds. I was a bit rushed and failed to notice the wheels had rotated unrealistically on a few shots, but hey ho! I have included a pilot figure in approximate 1940 kit simply for scale in a couple of the shots.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2582.JPG
Views:	5
Size:	1.7 KB
ID:	1153290


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2583.JPG
Views:	6
Size:	1.7 KB
ID:	1153291


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2584.JPG
Views:	9
Size:	1.6 KB
ID:	1153292

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2585.JPG
Views:	5
Size:	1.6 KB
ID:	1153293

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2586.JPG
Views:	8
Size:	1.7 KB
ID:	1153294



    I have no idea what's next, maybe that Italian biplane.
  • Tim Marlow
    SMF Supporters
    • Apr 2018
    • 19027
    • Tim
    • Somerset UK

    #2
    Great result for a great aeroplane.

    Comment

    • Mark1
      • Apr 2021
      • 4156

      #3
      Nice :thumb2:

      Comment

      • scottie3158
        SMF Supporters
        • Apr 2018
        • 14432
        • Paul
        • Holbeach

        #4
        Steve,
        That is a cracking result.

        Comment

        • BarryW
          SMF Supporters
          • Jul 2011
          • 6053

          #5
          A brilliant result Steve. Much as I am no fan of Special Hobby I do feel tempted, inspired by your build.

          as for the ‘Italian biplane’ do you mean the ICM 1/32 CR42 Falco? That’s another I find tempting. At the moment though I am building up a 1/48 multi-engine stash.

          Comment

          • stona
            • Jul 2008
            • 9889

            #6
            Thanks chaps.

            Barry, yes, the ICM CR.42. I was going to start it when this kit became available. It's the only other kit I own, so I will probably get it built.

            I will eventually build another of these Whirlwinds in the Day Fighter Scheme, assuming that it is still available. The kit didn't put me off! The hardest part was probably the undercarriage, apart from some generally vague fits. I had to drill and pin a couple of the antenna or they would never have stayed in place with a 'wire' under tension. If I built one posed in flight at least the undercarriage shouldn't be a problem :smiling3:

            I'm sure you would make a very nice job of it.

            Comment

            • adt70hk
              SMF Supporters
              • Sep 2019
              • 10506

              #7
              Looks good on my phone Steve. Will try and have a proper look later.

              ATB.

              Andrew

              Comment

              • Andy the Sheep
                SMF Supporters
                • Apr 2019
                • 1864
                • Andrea
                • North Eastern Italy

                #8
                Nice result, Steve. :thumb2:
                Now, that kit is definitely on top of my wish list!

                Andrea

                Comment

                • prichrd1
                  • Apr 2018
                  • 694
                  • Paul
                  • Conwy

                  #9
                  You've worked your magic again. Excellent finish, and as you say looks like a Whirlwind. :thumb2: :thumb2::thumb2:
                  Will wait for the next instalment - Whirlwind Part II The Day Fighter Scheme!!!! :smiling::tongue-out3::smiling:

                  Paul.
                  :smiling:

                  Comment

                  • Neil Merryweather
                    • Dec 2018
                    • 5277
                    • London

                    #10
                    absolutely lovely job Steve

                    Comment

                    • Gern
                      • May 2009
                      • 9273

                      #11
                      Beautiful

                      Comment

                      • Vaughan
                        • Apr 2011
                        • 3199

                        #12
                        A great result Steve.

                        Comment

                        • Nicko
                          SMF Supporters
                          • Apr 2019
                          • 1553
                          • Nick
                          • East Anglia

                          #13
                          Impressive stuff there Steve.

                          Nick

                          Comment

                          • yak face
                            Moderator
                            • Jun 2009
                            • 14078
                            • Tony
                            • Sheffield

                            #14
                            Fantastic build steve , a beautiful aircraft . Top work on the figure too he looks excellent, cheers tony

                            Comment

                            • minitnkr
                              SMF Supporters
                              • Apr 2018
                              • 7652
                              • Paul
                              • Dayton, OH USA

                              #15
                              Just outstanding.

                              Comment

                              Working...