without sounding thick and never having seen star wars. do you think this commision request is a little....erm ..optomistic? it is a genuine request!!!!!
1.16th deathstar
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Tags: None
-
Guest
-
Originally posted by \Do you have a warehouse that covers about 3 miles.Comment
-
Originally posted by \wow that is going to be Huge I thinkThe first Death Star was 160 kilometers in diameter, while the second Death Star was 900 kilometers in diameter.
So i think you got your answer
Cheers RichiComment
-
-
well it depends, looking for sizes I also found this
a small quote
OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE RESPONSE TO Secure resources and funding, and begin construction of a Death Star by 2016.
This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
By Paul Shawcross
The Administration shares your desire for job creation and a strong national defense, but a Death Star isn't on the horizon. Here are a few reasons:
- The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.
- The Administration does not support blowing up planets.
- Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?
Complete text LINK
Take it with a laugh.Comment
- The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.
-
Originally posted by \well it depends, looking for sizes I also found thisa small quote
OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE RESPONSE TO Secure resources and funding, and begin construction of a Death Star by 2016.
This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
By Paul Shawcross
The Administration shares your desire for job creation and a strong national defense, but a Death Star isn't on the horizon. Here are a few reasons:
- The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.
- The Administration does not support blowing up planets.
- Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?
Complete text LINK
sod the photo etch then!
Take it with a laugh.Originally posted by \well it depends, looking for sizes I also found thisa small quote
OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE RESPONSE TO Secure resources and funding, and begin construction of a Death Star by 2016.
This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
By Paul Shawcross
The Administration shares your desire for job creation and a strong national defense, but a Death Star isn't on the horizon. Here are a few reasons:
- The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.
- The Administration does not support blowing up planets.
- Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?
Complete text LINK
Take it with a laugh.Comment
- The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.
-
oh Wow this will be very interesting to see,thats so huge,
theres a link to some pics for you Rob,
cannot wait to see this one good luck Mr fish,lol,
hook line and sinker get it,
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=death star model kits&biw=1906&bih=946&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&s a=X&ei=rsqhVLybEsOmmAWNiYKwCQ&sqi=2&ved=0CCUQsAQComment
-
Guest
'That's no moon, it's a space station.'
It was a giant space station that had a lazer on it that could destroy planets, so yes, it was about the size of a small moon, probally just smaller than oursComment
-
Comment