If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Ha-ha I'm resisting the impulse to counter that assertion!
Originally posted by \
Ha-ha I'm resisting the impulse to counter that assertion!
Smart decision
Originally posted by \
What about a warship set 1:1200 scale?
battleship-king
aircraft carrier-queen
battle cruiser/-rook
heavy cruiser/pocket battleship-bishop
escort carrier-knight
destroyer-pawn
Vehicle:
Allied.
Pershing-king
Sherman Firefly-queen
Priest/Sexton-rook
Sherman-bishop
Churchill-knight
half track(or recce vehicle)-pawn
Axis.
Tiger-king
King Tiger-queen
Hummel-rook
Panther-bishop
Panzer IV-knight
half track(or recce vehicle)-pawn
I think every one would have their own set of favorites, Pershing would make a good King but never really had the chance to make it's bones, the Sherman and all it's variants was by far the war winner
Smart decision
I think every one would have their own set of favorites, Pershing would make a good King but never really had the chance to make it's bones, the Sherman and all it's variants was by far the war winner
Next to the T34 which was superior in many ways to many of the current crop of tanks at the time, maybe they can vie for King & Queen of the battle field. The most deserving I think though not as glamorous as the others...............Jim
Smart decision
I think every one would have their own set of favorites, Pershing would make a good King but never really had the chance to make it's bones, the Sherman and all it's variants was by far the war winner
I could do with a laugh Jim, so why don't you PM me with your version of world history had we not held out alone against the German war machine for 2 years
I could do with a laugh Jim, so why don't you PM me with your version of world history had we not held out alone against the German war machine for 2 years
the long run
Originally posted by \
The Sherman may have been a winner Jim but not on its design capabilities.
It was an ordinary machine with a deadly petrol engine (the Ronson effect),
a high profile and a very ordinary gun. The only gun, from my reading, was
the British 6 pounder which came a little bit close to the German 88's.
The Sherman wins due to the speed with which the USA produced the Sherman
to replace losses and overtake the numbers lost in the field. Fortunate that the
Germans did not have the same capability.
The greatest problem was the exceptional loss of tank men who were experienced
and the accelerated loss of new tank men due to their inexperience in the fiield
Laurie
All that may be true but in the over all analysis it cannot be denied that those two tanks had the most effect in the war historically, mediocre designs or not which cannot be said of T34 which was a dynamic design right down to the wider tracks and diesel engine, so much so that the Germans copied many design features in making the Panther
I could do with a laugh Jim, so why don't you PM me with your version of world history had we not held out alone against the German war machine for 2 years
Depends on which factors are taken into account Jim. One factor does stand out it was a pawn.
Many of them but soon to be dismissed from the chess board.
Laurie
Dunno about that Laurie, I've won many a game thanks to my pawns, especially those who become queens
Comment