Scale Model Shop

Collapse

Money puzzle

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guest

    #16
    Originally posted by KarlW
    I used (49/2)*(1+49)=1225
    Like I was taught at school...........
    I can’t recall ever being taught anything like that … Mathematics was never my strong suit largely because of it being too abstract for it to come easily to me — it would have been nice had they taught us practical solutions like that.

    FWIW, the other way I would have solved it would have been:
    Code:
    % python
    Python 3.9.6 (default, Oct 18 2022, 12:41:40) 
    [Clang 14.0.0 (clang-1400.0.29.202)] on darwin
    Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
    >>> total = 0
    >>> for n in range(1,50):
    ...     total += n
    ... 
    >>> print(total)
    1225

    Comment

    • Gern
      • May 2009
      • 9263

      #17
      Originally posted by stillp
      If only you knew a maths teacher who could explain it to you Dave... :tongue-out:
      Pete
      Yeah. But just about all I got was geometry, trig and calculus - of absolutely no use in the real world! I could have done with some statistics, which seems to be very trendy in secondary education nowadays, but it was seen as mere arithmetic back then so wasn't on the syllabus I was taught.

      Comment

      • boatman
        • Nov 2018
        • 14498
        • christopher
        • NORFOLK UK

        #18
        WELL i could never do logsarithims which to me seemed a total waste of time an still cant
        chrisb

        Comment

        • Guest

          #19
          Originally posted by Gern
          I could have done with some statistics, which seems to be very trendy in secondary education nowadays, but it was seen as mere arithmetic back then so wasn't on the syllabus I was taught.
          Sounds a bit like, but even worse than, how it was when I went to Dutch secondary school in the 80s/early 90s. We had a choice of what was known as Maths A and Maths B. Maths A was intended for those who took subjects like Economics, Maths B for those who took things like Physics and Chemistry. The former taught statistics and stuff, the latter the more “hard” mathematics. As a result, everything I know about statistics, I picked up as a result of playing games (non-computer) because I was never even taught anything as simple as the chance of a coin landing on one side vs. the other.

          Comment

          • Tim Marlow
            SMF Supporters
            • Apr 2018
            • 18994
            • Tim
            • Somerset UK

            #20
            Originally posted by Jakko
            Sounds a bit like, but even worse than, how it was when I went to Dutch secondary school in the 80s/early 90s. We had a choice of what was known as Maths A and Maths B. Maths A was intended for those who took subjects like Economics, Maths B for those who took things like Physics and Chemistry. The former taught statistics and stuff, the latter the more “hard” mathematics. As a result, everything I know about statistics, I picked up as a result of playing games (non-computer) because I was never even taught anything as simple as the chance of a coin landing on one side vs. the other.
            Sounds like the A level options I had in the late seventies. Maths and stats for those doing biology, and Applied maths for those doing Chemistry and Physics…..
            I studied Biology and Chemistry, so did the stats set and never used any of it……those doing Applied maths, chemistry and physics loved it….apparently it was like doing two and a half A levels instead of three…..

            Comment

            • Tim Marlow
              SMF Supporters
              • Apr 2018
              • 18994
              • Tim
              • Somerset UK

              #21
              Originally posted by boatman
              WELL i could never do logsarithims which to me seemed a total waste of time an still cant
              chrisb
              Great way of doing multiplication and division without using a calculator Chris, otherwise they are just fun to play around with. Used them a lot, along with natural logs, in my early fermentation days because bug populations grow exponentially. That is, they double in a set period of time ……… you need to graph the growth curve using log paper. if you tried to use normal graph paper the Y axis would have to be several feet long……

              Comment

              • Tim Marlow
                SMF Supporters
                • Apr 2018
                • 18994
                • Tim
                • Somerset UK

                #22
                Originally posted by Gern
                Yeah. But just about all I got was geometry, trig and calculus - of absolutely no use in the real world! I could have done with some statistics, which seems to be very trendy in secondary education nowadays, but it was seen as mere arithmetic back then so wasn't on the syllabus I was taught.
                Geometry and Trig are very useful in the real world Dave. I’ve used them to set out raised beds in my garden, for example, just using simple measurement. Calculus is just quiz questions for mathematicians though…..but I always loved algebra. It really is like a crossword for the mathematically minded……

                Comment

                • Gern
                  • May 2009
                  • 9263

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Tim Marlow
                  Geometry and Trig are very useful in the real world Dave. I’ve used them to set out raised beds in my garden, for example, just using simple measurement. Calculus is just quiz questions for mathematicians though…..but I always loved algebra. It really is like a crossword for the mathematically minded……
                  OK. I'll give you that Tim. Working with basic triangles and stuff like that can be useful, but what about cartesian representations of conic sections - which have all fallen out of the bottom of my brain? And I only once got to use sin2A = 2sinAcosA in a problem given to me as a puzzle. (If you're interested, imagine a ladder 30ft long leaning against a wall. The ladder just touches an extension of the wall which is 10ft high and 10ft wide. How far from the base of the wall is the bottom of the ladder?)

                  Got to agree about algebra - I tried to use it with my students to teach them about fractions, ratios, scales & proportion, using equations and changing units of measurement - but it seems algebra has been de-emphasised in secondary school so very few had any idea what I was talking about.

                  Comment

                  • stillp
                    SMF Supporters
                    • Nov 2016
                    • 8137
                    • Pete
                    • Rugby

                    #24
                    I was pretty useless at maths in school, with the possible exception of geometry, which taught me that the best way to solve a problem is to do what you know and work from there. (Hope that makes sense!).
                    I once did an Open University course called "Modelling by Mathematics", which started with basic arithmetic but by the end of the year was using A-level equivalent calculus to work out real-world problems such as the effect on traffic flow of a new supermarket, and the best way to organise bus routes in a town. Made my 'ed 'urt. Couldn't do any of it now, my brain has atrophied. I prefer modelling by polystyrene.
                    Pete

                    Comment

                    Working...