Just my opinion-for 'scale' modelling, an AB is essential. Brushmarks are an ever-present hazard without one & I doubt anyone can leave 1/35 scale brushmarks. I think Graham covered most of the issues about actual use of an AB, it's not as difficult as what some think, just like anything else-the more you do it, the easier it becomes.
With regard to real-life armour, does anyone really think they were painted by hand on the production line? Of course they weren't, it was done by spraying. I do accept that sometimes this wasn't the case but most of the time it was. Even camo patterns in the field were usually done this way & the reason for that brings me to another point raised previously.
How much paint is used with an AB? A tiny amount because you're laying down a coat measured in microns. You only have to look at modern production techniques to know that spraying is the most economical way to apply paint.
Personally, I think it's a 'get-out' clause to suggest that armour modelling means less care need be taken with the finish or that an AB is not as necessary because it's a tank or similar. I think that because AFV's go through a far more varied amount of conditions than an aircraft, the skill needed to accurately reproduce that effect is no less demanding than it is than to depict an aircraft sitting on a runway or hardstand. That's not knocking aircraft modellers however, as I intend to build a few myself.
No-one can do without a brush or two but to anyone who's not tried an AB-well, you're missing out! Having only used one for a few months, I can see the possibilities they offer than just brushing simply can't match. Can you pre/post shade, mottle, fade or colour modulate with just a brush?
All you AB virgins out there, give it a try! With the cheap prices of some on ebay or similar, what have you got to lose? A few quid coz you can start off with propellant cans instead of a compressor.
There, now I'm off my soapbox and taking a valium!
Patrick
With regard to real-life armour, does anyone really think they were painted by hand on the production line? Of course they weren't, it was done by spraying. I do accept that sometimes this wasn't the case but most of the time it was. Even camo patterns in the field were usually done this way & the reason for that brings me to another point raised previously.
How much paint is used with an AB? A tiny amount because you're laying down a coat measured in microns. You only have to look at modern production techniques to know that spraying is the most economical way to apply paint.
Personally, I think it's a 'get-out' clause to suggest that armour modelling means less care need be taken with the finish or that an AB is not as necessary because it's a tank or similar. I think that because AFV's go through a far more varied amount of conditions than an aircraft, the skill needed to accurately reproduce that effect is no less demanding than it is than to depict an aircraft sitting on a runway or hardstand. That's not knocking aircraft modellers however, as I intend to build a few myself.
No-one can do without a brush or two but to anyone who's not tried an AB-well, you're missing out! Having only used one for a few months, I can see the possibilities they offer than just brushing simply can't match. Can you pre/post shade, mottle, fade or colour modulate with just a brush?
All you AB virgins out there, give it a try! With the cheap prices of some on ebay or similar, what have you got to lose? A few quid coz you can start off with propellant cans instead of a compressor.
There, now I'm off my soapbox and taking a valium!
Patrick
Comment