We've just come back from our sons annual review now I don't think I've mentioned this on here before but my son has Cerable Pawlsy and this affects his motor skills and his legs and he has a statement of educational needs which states he has 25 hours of assistance in class and in his first year at senior school he was given this but this year they opted to get rid of over half of the LSA's (learning study assistants ) this ment that there was only one per class and it just so happened the school accepted some kids with severe learning difficulties who were in my sons tutor group , this ment that my son would not get the assistance he should have and his grades slipped back a little due to this now my son with all his problems is a very bright boy and has the potential to go far given the assistance.
We have been on at the school all year to give him what's in his statement and nothing more which we have been given lip service over.
As I've already Said we went to his annual review today and they talked about how well he had done and the teachers were all pleased with his efforts and they were enfisising how well he's done which amounts to below average.
Well then they asked us if we had anything to add well at these big meetings there is always these of sen department taking notes for the review
As soon as we were asked about what we thought I shot her down with this
Well the school might think it's good to praise under achievement but I don't , Paul could have done much better had he got the same level of support he got in his first year but he didn't and I made the point that my son had done fantastically well considering the school had let him down , and I thought the sen learders pen was going to catch fire she was scribbling so fast and the look on her face changed from pleasent to disgust when I mentioned that having an lsa in the classroom was far different from one to one assistance and that my son could be much more than average.
The senco looked very embarrest lol
We have been on at the school all year to give him what's in his statement and nothing more which we have been given lip service over.
As I've already Said we went to his annual review today and they talked about how well he had done and the teachers were all pleased with his efforts and they were enfisising how well he's done which amounts to below average.
Well then they asked us if we had anything to add well at these big meetings there is always these of sen department taking notes for the review
As soon as we were asked about what we thought I shot her down with this
Well the school might think it's good to praise under achievement but I don't , Paul could have done much better had he got the same level of support he got in his first year but he didn't and I made the point that my son had done fantastically well considering the school had let him down , and I thought the sen learders pen was going to catch fire she was scribbling so fast and the look on her face changed from pleasent to disgust when I mentioned that having an lsa in the classroom was far different from one to one assistance and that my son could be much more than average.
The senco looked very embarrest lol
Comment