Yes its A ???
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Even tough old it’s still a Tamiya so little probs in construction and some nice etch too.
Have fun Bob :thumb2:Comment
-
Me too Simon, but Kfzderwehrmacht site has a table of Sd. Kfz. numbers and it looks like this,
And it shows no sign of a 167. Crazy!!!Life's to short to be a sheep...Comment
-
Comment
-
Hi Steve
Thankfully for the Germans the design of the StuG IV had been looked at before Alkett was badly bombed. I much prefer the StuG 111.Comment
-
Comment
-
Guest
Page 359 of Kraftfahrzeuge und Panzer der Reichswehr, Wehrmacht und Bundeswehr ab 1900 (Werner Oswald, Stuttgart: Motorbuch Verlag, 2004) agrees with the table you posted, and comparing the two, I don’t get the impression one is a direct copy of the other. However, this doesn’t really prove anything substantial, of course. Oddly, Spielberger’s Sturmgeschütze doesn’t seem to give an Sd.Kfz. number for the StuG IV at all.Comment
-
-
-
GuestComment
-
Comment
-
Guest
I just found it does after all: page 182 also calls it Sd.Kfz. 167 in a table with monthly production figures.
However (to add to the post by Dave Ward above) it says 1141 were taken up by the Waffenamt while Krupp produced 1111 (the other, first, thirty were assembled at Daimler-Benz on chassis from Nibelungenwerke).Comment


Comment