Revell AVRO Shackleton AEW.2

[colin m]

Well it was a toss up between the Airfix and the Revell version of the new moulds tail dragging Shackletons. Even though I'm a big fan of new Airfix offerings, I went for the Revell Growler based on surface detail alone really. Which of course meant I had to wait. Whilst Airfix Shack's were popping up, I had to wait, and wait. I'm not very good at waiting.


Anyway, this turned up a day or two ago.


The box, normal open end type of Revell box.






The instructions, nice.






Decals, lots of for the use of.






Just a couple of sprue shots,














So, today I fully intend to immerse myself in.......................decorating. But, when the bathroom is done, sprue cutting shall commence.


Colin M....

[papa 695]

There looks like some great detail on this one Colin.


Well I've just pulled up my chair, but hurry up with the bathroom Colin, just like you I'm not a very good waiter.

[Vaughan]

Just been looking at the 2015 new tooling Airfix version as my father in-law flew them in the Far East in the early 60's. His was an MR.2 in 205 squadron and the Airfix has those markings. But looking at your sprue shots they look very detailed. The Airfix version does come with weighted wheels, but I'm sure you could get resin versions. The rivet detail looks very good vertually none on the airfix and the panel lines are very deep. Looking forward to this build.

[Guest]

Read a review on this the other day by a very experienced and good aircraft modeller that as good as dismissed the comments about the fuselage shape being out. They gave this kit a great review and a huge thumbs up. He also had been waiting for the Revell kit over the Airfix one. And it has the 'spark plug' sticking out the top that first caught my eye on the MR 3/3 that they have at Newark. Looking forward to seeing it build up Colin.

[Gern]

I'm sure I read a description of the Shackleton saying it was "10000 rivets flying in close formation!" Looking at the details here, I can see where that comes from!


I would like to build one but haven't decided which one to get. Will you keep us posted on the build please?

[colin m]

father in-law flew them in the Far East in the early 60's

That's nice to know Vaughan. As this is a relatively modern plane I've been able to find a few accounts from crew about living with the Growler, even one account from a pilot's wife !

Will you keep us posted on the build please?

Indeed Dave, the work starts tonight.

[papa 695]

That's nice to know Vaughan. As this is a relatively modern plane I've been able to find a few accounts from crew about living with the Growler, even one account from a pilot's wife !
Indeed Dave, the work starts tonight.

Yippee

[Gern]

That's nice to know Vaughan. As this is a relatively modern plane I've been able to find a few accounts from crew about living with the Growler, even one account from a pilot's wife !
Indeed Dave, the work starts tonight.

I'll be watching!

[Vaughan]

I've just bought the April edition of FlyPast and would you believe it it has a whole spotlight section on the Avro Shackleton and not just that but the photo of the crew stood next to a Shackleton of 205 squadron is in fact my father in law Vic Millard(first left). He past away in 2006 and I never had the chance to have any real conversations about his days in the RAF. My mother in law has the original photo which I have quickly photographed with my iPhone details of the crew are on the back. The photo is very precious to her so she wouldn't let me take it from her house to scan it. She also has his flight log of all the Shackleton's he flew in plus other aircraft during his career in the RAF. I'm still undecided which Shackleton to go for but the Airfix version does have the 205 markings albeit from the 70s.

[colin m]

Well Vaughan, with such a personal attachment to an aircraft, that is going to be a great build, which ever you go for. So, maybe it's time for an opinion on the Revell 'Growler'


It's quite obvious that the Airfix version has a lot more detailed interior. That's good but how much will be visible ? Whereas, the Revell has great exterior detail. Having said that, the Revell is sparse to the extreme.


This is the cockpit.






Believe it or not, I've actually added a few bits here to liven it up a bit. But that didn't do much so, even though I said a long time ago, no more 1:72 PE, I had to get this.






So, blue seat belts - what's not to like ??






The below is the Fwd gunner (no guns on this variant) / aimer position. It was completely devoid of any detail, so lots of old PE was slapped on to bring it to life. More work still required in this area.






However, my kit is not without it's problems. Glazing,






That's a bit rubbish - email sent to Revell, but no reply as yet.


Also, I do have a few bits of flash to contend with.






The flash isn't a major issue, but with a brand new tool kit, I was expecting something better. In fact overall, the fit is not as good as any of the New tool Airfix kits I've built recently. Most of which were built with out any filler. This Revell new tool is absorbing small amounts of filler quite frequently.


Colin M....

[Guest]

I watched the Flory models YouTube review of the Revell kit just the other day and the glass work was loads better than that Collin, keep trying with Revell, that is definitely a bad batch.

[yak face]

Nice start Colin , I agree with graham though - keep bugging Revell , that is obviously a duff clear sprue . cheers tony

[Gern]

Those kit parts don't look too good Colin. I thought the Revell new tool kits were supposed to be pretty good, but that looks like it comes from one of their old Monogram moulds from 40 years ago!

[papa 695]

Well Colin I'd like to say I can see a great start, but not through that glazing .


Keep at them Colin

[colin m]

Well that's two emails I've sent to Revell and still no reply. I even attached a picture with the last email.


I could try polishing, but the fault seems to be all the way through the parts. Quite honestly, I would sooner be doing something more interesting the polishing duff parts.