Theme editor

Scale Model Shop

F89 Scorpion

Status
Not open for further replies.

PaulTRose

Active member
Joined
Jun 13, 2013
Messages
7,424
Reaction score
1,544
Points
113
Location
Tattooine
1/3
Thread owner
this one is for fun........im sharing even though im building it for a GB on another forum.......theme is 'What if' so imagination can run wild

F89 was a bomber interceptor from the 50's to late 60's and was used only by the USAF

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_F-89_Scorpion

plan is what if it was a bit better than it really was?..........what if other NATO countries bought it?.....after all surely they would have had a need to intercept Soviet bomber?

going to replace the various missiles in the kit (Falcons, Mighty Mouse and Genies) with Sidewinders which is timeline correct as they did replace the under performing Falcons, grey/green camo and either Belgian or Dutch markings

kit is an old Revell one that i aquired with no decals or instructions

2a7xx53.jpg

nzelpj.jpg

ae73hv.jpg

2501iqg.jpg
 
Paul,
you can get the instructions here * scorpion * ( about 1/2 way down ) it's a later boxing, with different decals, but the parts should be the same .
Dave
 
Thread owner
i already have.........i even emailed them to myself at work so i could use the printer there cos im a cheapskate.......then left them in my desk! :rolling::rolling:
 
going to replace the various missiles in the kit (Falcons, Mighty Mouse and Genies) with Sidewinders which is timeline correct as they did replace the under performing Falcons
I’d think AIM-7 Sparrows would be more likely, given that the AIM-9 was a US Navy missile that the USAF adopted somewhat grudgingly. On the other hand, Sidewinders need far less kit in the plane and are a lot cheaper.

grey/green camo and either Belgian or Dutch markings
The choice there is obvious: red/white/blue roundels of course look far better than black/yellow/red ones :)
 
Thread owner
I’d think AIM-7 Sparrows would be more likely, given that the AIM-9 was a US Navy missile that the USAF adopted somewhat grudgingly. On the other hand, Sidewinders need far less kit in the plane and are a lot cheaper.

i disagree........'winders are more comparable to the Falcons, from a similar time frame..........both are short range where as the Sparrow is a medium range.........dont think it was that grudgingly :smiling: falcons perfomance in combat was terrible.......upgraded sidewinders are still being made after 60+ years!....even the Soviets copied them
 
True, but the AIM-7 was a USAF project while the AIM-9 was US Navy. The USAF only got them because they were pretty much forced to buy F-4 Phantoms that more or less came with Sidewinders, and only when Vietnam showed that Sidewinders were better than Sparrows and Falcons, did they really embrace them, AFAIK.

Of course this is all speculation, and since this isn’t going to be a USAF model anyway, the cheaper Sidewinder would probably be more likely anyway. Neither the Netherlands nor Belgium ever used Sparrows at all, though of course, they didn’t use F-89s either :)
 
Thread owner
thats the joy of whiffs.....dont need to follow the rules

years ago i did a whole series of aircraft along with a few thousand word back story about how the axis powers overrun western europe, a large chunk of russia and northern africa in 1940s........USA stayed neutral and became isolationist since pearl harbour never happened......british commonwealth aligned with the soviets

technically both belgium and the netherlands do use the sparrow.........both have frigates that use the sea sparrow variant :tongue-out::tongue-out:
 
years ago i did a whole series of aircraft along with a few thousand word back story about how the axis powers overrun western europe, a large chunk of russia and northern africa in 1940s........USA stayed neutral and became isolationist since pearl harbour never happened......british commonwealth aligned with the soviets
I’ve built a fair number of 1/35 scale military vehicles based on the setting of the Twilight: 2000 roleplaying game. That gave the a cool opportunity to build modern, 1990s AFVs kitted out much like those in the Second World War or Vietnam had been instead of the much cleaner way they usually appear on exercises etc.

technically both belgium and the netherlands do use the sparrow.........both have frigates that use the sea sparrow variant :tongue-out::tongue-out:
Good idea, paint it in MLD colours and markings, and stick naval launch boxes under the wings!
 
Thread owner
this is one weird looking plane........chunky fuselage, spindly tail and big flat straight wings

ready for a shot of primer, see what it looks like before i start painting

nmb1xe.jpg

ivliqq.jpg
 
Well it certainly has looks only a mother could love. But that just makes for a most interesting subject for us model makers.
 
Paul,
I have to agree with Colin a strange looking beast but you are making a fine job of it.
 
Thread owner
with the wing tip tanks on this really is quite a big aircraft!

camo on, next is some clearcoat ready for decals

2ic3bqr.jpg

vy62j8.jpg
 
You know, I just realised that the F-89 really looks like somebody had lying around a fuselage from an early jet fighter, a tail from a light aircraft, and a set of wings from an early jet bomber, and decided to stick them together.
 
Thread owner
its going Dutch.....next step is some matt coat then final assembly.....keeping it simple, need it off the bench asap ready for next project

2vmevb6.jpg

wqwwzk.jpg
 
Looking at those Sidewinders, how long are you supposing the KLu kept this thing in service, then? :)
 
Thread owner
Looking at those Sidewinders, how long are you supposing the KLu kept this thing in service, then? :smiling3:

they only used Hunters for 6 years before moving to the F104 which they for 20+ years so who knows
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top