discussion Getting to the bottom of the pile, Tamiya StuG Ausf B

[Lee W]

Great stuff Bob

Lee

 

[Jim R]

Hi Bob
Looks fine despite the decal issues. Certainly the tide mark stain in not good.
Jim

 

[BattleshipBob]

Great stuff Bob

Lee

Many thanks Lee

Hi Bob
Looks fine despite the decal issues. Certainly the tide mark stain in not good.
Jim

Hi Jim, thanks for that, yep decal tide mark is horrible. Applied a load of spare decals onto a test kit and perfect, so hands up my fault!

 

[David Lovell]

Ah Racey would say serves you right ,a lot of Russian stuff doesn't have markings hence no decal dramas(why do you think I build them). Joking aside bummer but I think we've all suffered the same at some point other wise what a job straight out of the top draw Bob ,I love the gun cleaning rods and pioneer tools I always think its the small things that make or break yours make . Dave

 

[BattleshipBob]

Ah Racey would say serves you right ,a lot of Russian stuff doesn't have markings hence no decal dramas(why do you think I build them). Joking aside bummer but I think we've all suffered the same at some point other wise what a job straight out of the top draw Bob ,I love the gun cleaning rods and pioneer tools I always think its the small things that make or break yours make . Dave

Very kind David:thumb2: much appreciated.

 

[adt70hk]

Bob

Sorry to hear of the problems. Just watched their video on how to use it and it looks like really aggressive stuff.

As you say it's not explicit about not using a varnish coat, only by implication.

The Stug is turned out well nonetheless. Good luck with the Hummel.

ATB.

Andrew

 

[BattleshipBob]

Bob

Sorry to hear of the problems. Just watched their video on how to use it and it looks like really aggressive stuff.

As you say it's not explicit about not using a varnish coat, only by implication.

The Stug is turned out well nonetheless. Good luck with the Hummel.

ATB.

Andrew

Thanks Andrew

Have used it on a test kit and no problems