Martin would have been good at presenting more of the engineering side of the restoration, he does have an empathy for that kind of nuts 'n' bolts stuff.
The programme was completely unfocused and didn't seem to know what it was trying to say. I think they probably thought a documentary about the restoration would have less attraction to the man on the Clapham omnibus than a vague and dithering affair that just regurgitated a lot of the old nonsense about the Spitfire and the battle of Britain. I reckon they only mentioned Stephenson because it meant they could also mention Bader and the Queen, and drag his two daughters in for a bit of painfully staged 'human interest'. Aside from that anyone could have been flying the aircraft when it was lost. It was dire.
After an hour and a half I had not learnt anything I didn't already know and could point to many, many things that the programme got wrong. It's inexcusable and just reflects the sort of sloppy journalism and programme making we have inflicted upon us in these days of cheap TV filling hundreds of channels.
BTW what the hell has a .50 calibre Browning got to do with a Spitfire Mk I ? Maybe it was the only machine gun the producers could get their hands on. They'd have been better off showing the real problem, how little damage the .303 did, particularly against an armoured target.
The Germans already had a couple of Spitfires by the time this one went down, and in more flyable condition.
Cheers
Steve
The programme was completely unfocused and didn't seem to know what it was trying to say. I think they probably thought a documentary about the restoration would have less attraction to the man on the Clapham omnibus than a vague and dithering affair that just regurgitated a lot of the old nonsense about the Spitfire and the battle of Britain. I reckon they only mentioned Stephenson because it meant they could also mention Bader and the Queen, and drag his two daughters in for a bit of painfully staged 'human interest'. Aside from that anyone could have been flying the aircraft when it was lost. It was dire.
After an hour and a half I had not learnt anything I didn't already know and could point to many, many things that the programme got wrong. It's inexcusable and just reflects the sort of sloppy journalism and programme making we have inflicted upon us in these days of cheap TV filling hundreds of channels.
BTW what the hell has a .50 calibre Browning got to do with a Spitfire Mk I ? Maybe it was the only machine gun the producers could get their hands on. They'd have been better off showing the real problem, how little damage the .303 did, particularly against an armoured target.
The Germans already had a couple of Spitfires by the time this one went down, and in more flyable condition.
Cheers
Steve