Nothing wrong with this Ron, she looks great.
'Kamikaze! 1/72 Nakajima B5N2 (Kate)....Okinawa.....Target:- British Carrier.
- Thread starter spanner570
- Start date
- Status
Gotta disagree there Col. That cheapo WWII Japanese paint is totally useless! Look how badly it's worn and chipped!
Fair point Dave. Mind you, if you think this looks bad, I wonder what's around the corner for poor Kate ?
Great posts folks....Ee, some did make me chuckle!
Right, I've started the 'destruction' process.
I've done the weathering, chipping, semi-dropped a landing wheel and generally mucked it up!
Mention Japanese aircraft and 'chipping' and it seems to mean the whole model surface has to be chipped to death and beyond. I would argue that only the leading edges and the front of the nose cowl would receive such treatment from stones and small amounts of debris, whereas the rest of the airframe would be more likely to be plain old worn paintwork and flaking.
So, right or wrong, this is the look I've tried for.....
View attachment 277339
I wanted more of a gradual worn look, so I blobbed a bit of silver paint on the model and then gently dabbed it with my finger to try and blend it in.
View attachment 277340
Next, holding the model vertical, I gave the whole thing a real good dose of watered down black acrylic paint and let the stuff run where it wanted to go. Leaving random patches and streaks...Luuuuverly!
View attachment 277341
The under belly. Rough as a bear's posterior - on purpose, and fitted with a nice big bomb from my bits bag. Mounted where the torpedo should have been.
One wheel retracted, one half out (or half in!)
View attachment 277342
All say Ah, for poor Kate!
Cheers all.....
Right, I've started the 'destruction' process.
I've done the weathering, chipping, semi-dropped a landing wheel and generally mucked it up!
Mention Japanese aircraft and 'chipping' and it seems to mean the whole model surface has to be chipped to death and beyond. I would argue that only the leading edges and the front of the nose cowl would receive such treatment from stones and small amounts of debris, whereas the rest of the airframe would be more likely to be plain old worn paintwork and flaking.
So, right or wrong, this is the look I've tried for.....
View attachment 277339
I wanted more of a gradual worn look, so I blobbed a bit of silver paint on the model and then gently dabbed it with my finger to try and blend it in.
View attachment 277340
Next, holding the model vertical, I gave the whole thing a real good dose of watered down black acrylic paint and let the stuff run where it wanted to go. Leaving random patches and streaks...Luuuuverly!
View attachment 277341
The under belly. Rough as a bear's posterior - on purpose, and fitted with a nice big bomb from my bits bag. Mounted where the torpedo should have been.
One wheel retracted, one half out (or half in!)
View attachment 277342
All say Ah, for poor Kate!
Cheers all.....
Attachments
Very nice work Ron
G
Looks suitably distressed.
Thanks everyone. It was fun dabbing the paint around with my fingers, like being back in Primary
School!
Ron
School!
Ron
Looking great Ron.
I dont think that the problem with Jap planes is that people weather the S#¤t out of them, the problem it the paint the Japanese used to paint them with was just no good. It was, correct me if I am wrong, more a lacquer than it was a paint and I believe it was sprayed directly onto the aluminium. Was it done to save time, money and most probable weight? No idea. It just fell off quicker than the could say Banziiiiiiiiiiiiii.
I dont think that the problem with Jap planes is that people weather the S#¤t out of them, the problem it the paint the Japanese used to paint them with was just no good. It was, correct me if I am wrong, more a lacquer than it was a paint and I believe it was sprayed directly onto the aluminium. Was it done to save time, money and most probable weight? No idea. It just fell off quicker than the could say Banziiiiiiiiiiiiii.
I agree totally with what you write, Ian.
But my point was that mention 'Chipping', and some modellers tend to chip the whole model. To my mind this is wrong. As we all know, any kind of chipping is done by summat hard hitting the paintwork. With an aircraft this is usually on the leading edges, engine cowl and prop. Not all over. The rest of the paint loss is, as you point out, lack of adhesion, rather than damage. That's why I resisted the 'full chip' and tried to get a more general worn and knackered look to the paintwork.
I know it sounds a bit pedantic and picky, but that's how I see it. But others will see it differently, which is fine, and in the modelling world that is how it should be too.
Any road up, I'm glad you like the model, and thanks for the feedback.
Ron.
P.S. I haven't a clue what paint was used. For all I know, it could have been B&Q's finest green emulsion!
But my point was that mention 'Chipping', and some modellers tend to chip the whole model. To my mind this is wrong. As we all know, any kind of chipping is done by summat hard hitting the paintwork. With an aircraft this is usually on the leading edges, engine cowl and prop. Not all over. The rest of the paint loss is, as you point out, lack of adhesion, rather than damage. That's why I resisted the 'full chip' and tried to get a more general worn and knackered look to the paintwork.
I know it sounds a bit pedantic and picky, but that's how I see it. But others will see it differently, which is fine, and in the modelling world that is how it should be too.
Any road up, I'm glad you like the model, and thanks for the feedback.
Ron.
P.S. I haven't a clue what paint was used. For all I know, it could have been B&Q's finest green emulsion!
I would love to hear a Japanese ask for a Large bucket of B&Q emulsion... lol
And you are quite right. the amount of chipping on any aircraft would be minimal and limited to the forward facing edges.
Now the aircraft is as good as finished ( in more ways than one!) I can turn my attention to both the sea and the carrier.
First the carrier. As I wrote earlier, I remembered I had a half completed one slowly disintegrating in my loft. So, I've been trying to sort it.
Here's the unpainted model straight out of the loft.
View attachment 277440
Here she is with what bits I could find, added. Then painted with, first, a medium grey, all over coat of acrylics. Followed by a darker grey applied in streaks over the still wet first coat.
View attachment 277441
A close up showing the very rough paintwork. I might do a bit more detail, but it's fit for purpose as it is, really. I'll see later in the build.
View attachment 277442
Thanks for looking.
Ron
Just spotted a busted gun barrel towards the stern....sorry!
First the carrier. As I wrote earlier, I remembered I had a half completed one slowly disintegrating in my loft. So, I've been trying to sort it.
Here's the unpainted model straight out of the loft.
View attachment 277440
Here she is with what bits I could find, added. Then painted with, first, a medium grey, all over coat of acrylics. Followed by a darker grey applied in streaks over the still wet first coat.
View attachment 277441
A close up showing the very rough paintwork. I might do a bit more detail, but it's fit for purpose as it is, really. I'll see later in the build.
View attachment 277442
Thanks for looking.
Ron
Just spotted a busted gun barrel towards the stern....sorry!
Attachments
G
This is looking real nice so far can't wait to see what you have in store.
It certainly is Dave, well spotted. She was sunk in 1941 and my build is circa. 1945. Thankfully, I mentioned in my initial post about the inclusion of a carrier, that the model from my loft is not historically accurate......All bases covered......I hope!
Thanks to Monica and Scott for your comments too.
Ron
It certainly is Dave, well spotted. She was sunk in 1941 and my build is circa. 1945. Thankfully, I mentioned in my initial post about the inclusion of a carrier, that the model from my loft is not historically accurate......All bases covered......I hope!
Thanks to Monica and Scott for your comments too.
Ron
I enjoy your builds without giving a monkey's about historical accuracy!
There's a coincidence Dave - I enjoy my builds without giving a monkey's about historical accuracy too!...
Rough old kit too - and it shows.
Just spotted a busted gun barrel towards the stern....sorry![/QUOTE]
Battle damage Ron.
Looking good, I like the painting technique.
Battle damage Ron.
Looking good, I like the painting technique.
- Status
Legal Notice
scalemodelling.co.uk is a privately operated online discussion forum. All content posted by members reflects their own views and opinions and does not necessarily represent those of the forum owners or administrators. While reasonable efforts are made to moderate content, no responsibility is accepted for user-generated material. By using this site, you agree to comply with UK law and the forum rules.