Theme editor

Scale Model Shop

spanner's 1/72 Airfix Starter Kit Spitfire.....'Reach for the Sky' (1956)

Poor b****r looks terrified of that huge hand when he should be grateful it's stopping him from falling to his death!
 
Thread owner
Nice one Dave. Thank you.

After leaving his right 'Leg' in the aircraft, he writes that he was really worried about landing on his other, still intact metal false one. He managed to survive and not be split in two as he feared.....
 
The man who is very likely to have shot down Bader is Lionel Harwood 'Buck' Casson (we had better names back then). He was a Sheffield man and experienced pilot, having joined No. 616 (South Yorkshire) Squadron, Auxiliary Air Force, at Doncaster on 6th April 1939.
Casson reported shooting the tail of a Bf 109 and watching the pilot abandon the aircraft at the base of the clouds, a description which matches Bader’s demise remarkably accurately.

As Ron says, only one Bf 109 was shot down in this action, and that was attributed to Philip ‘Nip’ Heppell (where did they get these names?). Heppell would later fly a Spitfire to Malta as part of Operation Spotter and claimed the Malta Spitfires’ first kill when he shot down a Bf 109 on 10 March 1942.

To be clear, such incidents were not as unusual as we would like to thing, and that Bader was surprised by an attack coming from behind and below may well have been the impetus for him concocting the collision story, first in a letter to his wife, but soon widely publicised and becoming 'fact' by repetition.
 
Thread owner
Thanks for all your input chaps.

Thanks also to Steve for his historical add-ons.

All much appreciated.

Here's yer man seconds after finally freeing himself from his crippled Spitfire. His right 'leg' remained jammed behind the control pedals.

P1360351.JPG

Next I'll make the fighter's prop. look like it's going around and around and......

Cheers.
Ron (Fully payed up for another 12 months)
 
Oh I say 570 splendid work , nice to read of the true facts .
Would have look good to say it was due to friendly fire .

Feeling a lot better thank you .
453 no longer coughing!
 
Superb storytelling as always matey ( and of course compliments to the chucker ) , poor old doug looks excellent in mid air ,trouser flapping , hoping his chute is going to deploy fully . Cheers tony
 
Thread owner
Thanks boys.

'No Longer Coughing'....Good to read you're a lot better.

'Mucker'. Thanks Matey. Compliments sent and I'll soon need her chucking arm too!



EEEEEOOOOOOWWWWW!

Prop. done. Made out of the clear plastic top of a food container and suitably messed with.

P1360358.JPG

Nearly there.

Cheers.
Ron
 
HI Ron yes that prop looks great an its goin at a heck of a rate an the spitty now looks powered very well DONE any chance of a little yellow goin round on the props tips ? but very good all the same or did the prop not have yellow tips ? 570
chrisb
 
Thread owner
Hi Chris, Thanks for the nice comments.

As far as I know, Spitfires at the time didn't have yellow tips.

I never bothered looking it up to be honest. I just went by the box art. Easy fix if yellow was present........

Ron
 
Easy fix if yellow was present........

It was.

I don't have an exact date, but they are visible on RAF aircraft in the mid 1930s (unless orthochromatic film was used!).

We do have the painting instructions for the repair of Rotol blades, which gives an idea of how it was originally done.

PAINTING.
38. After repair of covering, except Emergency Repairs, the repaired
parts shall be painted.
(i) Spray or paint with Grey Surfacer and allow to dry.
(ii) Spray or paint two or three coats of Matt Night, DTD.751/4.
(iii) The four-inch yellow tip should be given two or three coats
of Identification, Yellow DTD.751/5

(iv) Paint a White line, 1/32 in. wide at 0.70 of the original
radius, across the thrust face of the blade.
This line indicates the blade pitch angle checking station
and should be at right angles to the longitudinal axis.
(v) Blade identification markings should be made good.

My bold.

Bear in mind that 4" at 1/72 scale is just under 1.5mm.
 
Thread owner
Steve and Jim.
Thanks for the input. :thumb2:

Steve. I was going to P.M. you about the yellow tips, but I just knew you would come to the rescue. Thanks.
What a long winded application it was for sure!

I'd best add the yellow to my round and round effort, toot sweet. Thanks again for taking the time to clear things up.

Jim, glad you approve of yer man and the prop.

Back soon......;)

Ron
 
"What a long winded application it was for sure!"

A lot of them were. Some of the finishing instructions for airframe repairs put a great emphasis on the final result, filling, rubbing down (often using guide coats to ensure an even and level surface), final painting and cleaning. Of course, an aircraft in the metropolitan air force might receive much more 'correct' treatment than one in the Burmese jungle :)
 
Thread owner
You are spot on there Paul. This little discussion and a positive outcome is just another example of what is so good about this forum.

Thanks again Steve. Your knowledgeable input is always most welcome.......even if it means even more farting about with a bit of circular plastic! ;)

Here's my final attempt at a moving propeller. It's the best I can do, 'cos I'm starting to 'Fiddle' with the thing....... :upside:

P1360359.JPG

P1360360.JPG

Cheers.
Ron
 
Gettin' better all the time!

PS That spinner and foil 'damage' looks a bit fragile. Better make sure you got a good catcher when your chucker upperer does her thing.
 
Back
Top