1/3
Seems very reasonable to me ... !I always thought RE stood for Religious Education...
Well the Tiger and the Mustang along with the Spitfire have been flogged to death, so why not the 'Jug'.
Steve
Seems very reasonable to me ... !I always thought RE stood for Religious Education...
Well the Tiger and the Mustang along with the Spitfire have been flogged to death, so why not the 'Jug'.
It would be nice to have a shelf (shelves) filled with 1/2 tracks of the various M2/M3 kindsThat one is lightyears ahead of the Tamiya ones you were asking about :smiling3: Would be nice if they did the whole M2/M3 series and derivatives, though I guess they’re so far going for ones Dragon didn’t already release.
Carlus?No, also with:
This is kit 2200, as announced in the silhouette posted a few pages back: with a figure. That seems to be the only real addition here.
Having completed their CH2 1:35, I found it very good. It was only my second build and thought maybe I had taken on more than I may be capable of. However!! It went together well, good detail, instructions were understandable. I messed up a couple of things but that was down to me not the kit.Love the Leopard but does anybody have experience of RFA 'buildability'?
Steve
I had to do a treble take there. I found a couple of VWs and thought I had these but they are new type with sunroof and looks like new tyres. Maybe I will, maybe I won’t…On the Rye Field Model Facebook page..................a new release
............and boxart for their upcoming Leo 2A7
On the Magic Factory Facebook page boxart for their upcoming release
Even in 1/700, this is 481mm long!
Dave
I built their Sherman VC a few years ago (converted it to a standard V, though) and it was a pretty good experience. A few fiddly bits, but on the whole, I’d say about equal to a Takom kit. Which, in fact, it reminded me of rather a lot — to the extent it left me wondering if they’re two brands of the same company.Love the Leopard but does anybody have experience of RFM 'buildability'?
scalemodelling.co.uk is a privately operated online discussion forum. All content posted by members reflects their own views and opinions and does not necessarily represent those of the forum owners or administrators. While reasonable efforts are made to moderate content, no responsibility is accepted for user-generated material. By using this site, you agree to comply with UK law and the forum rules.