Theme editor

Scale Model Shop

Andrew's 1/72 Airfix P-40B Warhawk (Pearl Harbour)

adt70hk

Active member
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
10,720
Reaction score
890
Points
113
1/3
Thread owner
Afternoon all

Firstly, thanks to @Geoffers for suggesting this, even if I nearly missed it!

So discovering this GB came at a good time as, even before finishing the IAF Spitfire, I had decided that my next victim would be a P-40B of Pearl Harbour vintage.....even if I will struggle to finish it in time!

Although I have only ever built two US aircraft (F-51D and Corsair) this is something of a nostalgia build as one of the first ever military aircraft books I was bought as a child featured the P-40 in its Flying Tigers guise, and so I'm pretty sure it's the first US fighter I had heard of.

Whilst the P-40 gets a bad rep, it is perhaps a slightly unsung hero, given that it served throughout almost the entire war, in every theatre (that I can think of), in a variety of roles and was the third most produced US fighter of the war behind the P-51 and P-47, with almost 14,000 produced.

So some background on the plane, kit and my research so far***, just in case some of you are not familiar with it:

  • Curtiss P-40B Warhawk (although I understand that us Brits called the P-40B the Tomahawk to make life complicated)
  • Airfix No. A01003B - a 2021 reboxing of a 2011 tooling.
  • Colours.....a very short version, as this is another 'right colour' rabbit hole if you're not careful: no. 41 Olive Drab (a darker and browner green than the later war USAAF OD) and Neutral Gray (a mid-tone grey e.g. darker than the mid-late war RAF greys we're used to)
  • Generally looks good on the sprue, albeit some minor flash (but is a 2011 tooling), and the canopy looks nice and clear, and online reviews are positive, albeit the pilot is a bit blobby as usual for these earlier Airfix kits......but the kit cost me less than £7 so I can't really complain.
  • Destructions....nice and simple.....only 3 A4 pages of them....and not too many decals! Happy am I😁
  • However........Airfix would have you believe that the plane represented served with the 6th Pursuit Squadron, part of the 18th Pursuit Group. But I think they have it wrong, albeit I am awaiting confirmation. The 6th only flew P-36s as far as I have been able to find out. However, the 19th Pursuit Squadron (part of the same Group) were flying P-40s at the time of the attack. If I am right....happy to be proved wrong....then the markings are for a plane from the 19th that survived the attack and is still flying in the US (and previously flew at Duxford).
*** In terms of the research I'm being helped out by someone on a US forum I'm on who knows a lot about the early P-40s and their role in defending Pearl Harbour, so a lot of the credit goes to him!!

Obligatory introductory shots below!

ACW as usual.

ATB

Andrew


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------























 
Last edited:
Thread owner
YES ive always liked the ole P /40 as i love that film called death race with doug mac-clure in as he was flying a P/40 with the sharks mouth on in the desert great film hope to get it on dvd
chrisb
 
Good choice, the P40 is a nice aircraft, not the best, but given the number produced, it was certainly effective enough.
 
Thread owner
YES ive always liked the ole P /40 as i love that film called death race with doug mac-clure in as he was flying a P/40 with the sharks mouth on in the desert great film hope to get it on dvd
chrisb
Good choice, the P40 is a nice aircraft, not the best, but given the number produced, it was certainly effective enough.

Chris, Neil

Thanks for the support, as always.


Neil - as you say not the best but effective nonetheless....good but not quite as good as what followed...a bit like the Hurricane. That said, one of the reference books I have quotes another author's comments about them, to the effect that 'a 2nd rate fighter is better than no fighter at all' and he has a point. I also read somewhere that over 200 pilots became aces in them...no mean feat! And at least 20 were double aces!! So they cannot have been that bad!


Thanks again chaps.

ATB

Andrew
 
Neil - as you say not the best but effective nonetheless....good but not quite as good as what followed...a bit like the Hurricane.
...

Funny, I was thinking of the same analogy - a fine aircraft, eclipsed by later ones (Spitfire, and F5 / P47 / P51 respectively). As you say, clearly good enough to get that many aces.
 
Back
Top