Theme editor

Scale Model Shop

Steve's Spitfire Mk.IIa. Revell 1/32

I totally agree about painting the walkways, it is so much easier. I also paint the red patches, as I find that easier than decals as well.

She is looking great Steve.
 
Thread owner
I totally agree about painting the walkways, it is so much easier. I also paint the red patches, as I find that easier than decals as well.

She is looking great Steve.

I like to do decal patches as I can then leave them intact, and they will conform realistically to the gun port opening, or I can pierce them to simulate the guns having been fired. I can also apply them not too precisely, as I've noticed they were not always perfectly aligned!

Something like these on one, in Blue Peter style, I completed earlier.

IMG_1283.JPG
 
Looking great Steve. Nice spot with the camouflage detail, something I certainly would have missed. Maybe I trust kit manufacturers a bit too much.
 
Looking good Steve , the wing walk lines are a useful reference for my build as the starter kit doesnt supply any decals or any indication of where they should be either. Cheers tony
 
Thread owner
I've been applying decals this morning.

I used the ones with the appropriate codes and serials from Kits-World (sheet 132103), who I have never used before. The decals were very good, thin but not unreasonably fragile, and seem to have reacted to a first application of Microsol very well, so I'd definitely use them again.

Here's 'Stapme's Spitfire, as the decals snuggle down.

IMG_2268.JPG

There was the usual nonsense with heavily raised detail over which the decals will not conform. I simply cut the decals to get the air out and allow them to settle before applying softener. I can touch up the damage later, with paint.

IMG_2267.JPG
 
Thread owner
I'll just add that I have been asked the correct orientation of the 'steadying trestle' stencils.

Officially, they should be as I've done them, the outboard one readable from the wing tip and the inboard one readable from the 'aircraft axis', meaning the fuselage. A quick look at The spitfire hanging in the IWM, which still sports wartime paint, will show that this was by no means always the case in practice. You can do them however you like...prove me wrong :smiling3:
 
Thread owner
I've done some weathering this morning and applied the final varnish.

I want the Spitfire to look used, but not abused. The Squadron was busy, but this machine was only a couple of weeks old.

Here's the underside.
IMG_2270.JPG

Here's the top. As I expected, the sliding hood does not fit properly (it's just resting in place here) so I will have to fix it in the correct place eventually.

IMG_2273.JPG
 
Thread owner
The Fuhrerin has left me alone to continue bringing this one to a conclusion.

The flaps will be deployed, they had two positions, up and down. When deployed the actuator mechanism pushed a little door open on the top of each wing, looking like this.

flaps.jpg

I have attempted to replicate this with some bits of plastic and a bit of wire and have come up with this.

IMG_2274.JPG

Which, frankly, is good enough for me :)
 
Sorry, I can't edit my stuff after a set time, and I've just spotted a missing 'O' in my above post...... :upside:
 
Thread owner
This is done.

I'm still debating the antenna wires. I reckon that a Mk II with an 11 Group squadron in October/November would have had the new(ish) TR1133 VHF wireless fitted, so I'm not doing a wire from fin to mast.

I am still debating with myself whether I should fit the antennae from horizontal stabilisers to fuselage for the IFF system.

Here's a quick shot, I'll do a proper set of photos in a 'done' thread, hopefully tomorrow.

IMG_2279.JPG
 
Back
Top